Child Custody Arrangements - Gender Studies bibliographies - in Harvard style

In-text: (Atwool, 2001)

Your Bibliography: Atwool, N., 2001. Children's Voice in the Family Court. Journal of the Children's Issues Centre, [online] 5(1). Available at: <https://search.informit.com.au/fullText;dn=402564751246576;res=IELFSC> [Accessed 14 April 2020].

In-text: (Research Summary: Parenting arrangements after separation, 2019)

Your Bibliography: Australian Institute of Family Studies. 2019. Research Summary: Parenting arrangements after separation. [online] Available at: <https://aifs.gov.au/publications/parenting-arrangements-after-separation> [Accessed 14 April 2020].

In-text: (What does best interests of the child really mean?, 2015)

Your Bibliography: Craddock Murray Neumann Lawyers Sydney. 2015. What does best interests of the child really mean?. [online] Available at: <http://www.craddock.com.au/LegalNews/6009312-What-does-best-interests-of-the-child-really-mean.aspx> [Accessed 14 April 2020].

In-text: (What rights does a child have in a custody case?, 2016)

Your Bibliography: Craddock Murray Neumann Lawyers Sydney. 2016. What rights does a child have in a custody case?. [online] Available at: <http://www.craddock.com.au/LegalNews/6028555-What-rights-does-a-child-have-in-a-custody-case.aspx> [Accessed 14 April 2020].

In-text: (Evans, Haussegger, Halupka and Rowe, 2018)

Your Bibliography: Evans, M., Haussegger, V., Halupka, M. and Rowe, P., 2018. From Girls to Men: Social Attitudes to Gender Equality in Australia. [online] 50/50 by 2030 Foundation. Available at: <https://www.5050foundation.edu.au/assets/reports/documents/From-Girls-to-Men.pdf> [Accessed 17 April 2020].

In-text: (Hinds and Bradshaw, 2005)

Your Bibliography: Hinds, R. and Bradshaw, R., 2005. GENDER BIAS IN LAWYERS' AFFIDAVITS TO THE FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA. Family Court Review, [online] 43(3), pp.445-453. Available at: <https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1744-1617.2005.00045.x> [Accessed 14 April 2020].

In-text: (James, 2006)

Your Bibliography: James, C., 2006. Winners and Losers: The Father Factor in Australian Child Custody Law in the 20th Century. Legal History, [online] 10, pp.207-238. Available at: <https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/ausleghis10&div=16&g_sent=1&casa_token=&collection=journals#> [Accessed 14 April 2020].

In-text: (Keogh, Smyth and Masardo, 2018)

Your Bibliography: Keogh, E., Smyth, B. and Masardo, A., 2018. Law Reform for Shared-Time Parenting after Separation – Reflections from Australia. Singapore Academy of Law Journal (Special Issue), [online] 30 SAcLJ 518. Available at: <https://journalsonline.academypublishing.org.sg/Journals/Singapore-Academy-of-Law-Journal-Special-Issue/Current-Issue/ctl/eFirstSALPDFJournalView/mid/503/ArticleId/1304/Citation/JournalsOnlinePDF> [Accessed 14 April 2020].

In-text: (Martin, 2003)

Your Bibliography: Martin, E., 2003. Social work, the family and women's equality in post-war Australia. Women's History Review, 12(3), pp.445-468.

In-text: (Melville and Hunter, 2001)

Your Bibliography: Melville, A. and Hunter, R., 2001. As Everybody Knows - Countering Myths of Gender Bias in Family Law. Griffith Law Review, [online] 10(1), pp.124-138. Available at: <https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/griffith10&id=128&collection=journals&index=> [Accessed 14 April 2020].

In-text: (Miller, 2018)

Your Bibliography: Miller, A., 2018. Expertise Fails to Attenuate Gendered Biases in Judicial Decision-Making. Social Psychological and Personality Science, [online] 10(2), pp.227-234. Available at: <https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1948550617741181> [Accessed 14 April 2020].

In-text: (Moloney, 2001)

Your Bibliography: Moloney, L., 2001. Do Fathers 'Win' or Do Mothers 'Lose'? A Preliminary Analysis of Closely Contested Parenting Judgments in the Family Court of Australia. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, [online] 15(3), pp.363-396. Available at: <https://academic.oup.com/lawfam/article/15/3/363/915160?fbclid=IwAR2AIQ3jbJ_JvgGoPkdh2aimiD84ZUEMxhFeoPNufBvjQH4bl0zg7vYac58> [Accessed 14 April 2020].

In-text: (Shared Parental Responsibility, 2009)

Your Bibliography: O'Sullivan Davies Lawyers. 2009. Shared Parental Responsibility. [online] Available at: <https://www.osullivandavies.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/Shared-Parental-Responsibility.pdf> [Accessed 14 April 2020].

In-text: (Judges as susceptible to gender bias as laypeople -- and sometimes more so, 2018)

Your Bibliography: ScienceDaily. 2018. Judges as susceptible to gender bias as laypeople -- and sometimes more so. [online] Available at: <https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/04/180419141541.htm> [Accessed 14 April 2020].

In-text: (Sodha, 2020)

Your Bibliography: Sodha, S., 2020. The idea that family courts are biased against men is a dangerous fallacy. The Guardian, [online] Available at: <https://www.theguardian.com/society/commentisfree/2020/mar/05/family-courts-biased-men-dangerous-fallacy-abuse> [Accessed 14 April 2020].