These are the sources and citations used to research Gendered language of the workplace. This bibliography was generated on Cite This For Me on
In-text: (Gaucher, Friesen and Kay, 2011)
Your Bibliography: Gaucher, D., Friesen, J. and Kay, A., 2011. Evidence that gendered wording in job advertisements exists and sustains gender inequality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(1), pp.109-128.
In-text: (Hentschel, Heilman and Peus, 2019)
Your Bibliography: Hentschel, T., Heilman, M. and Peus, C., 2019. The Multiple Dimensions of Gender Stereotypes: A Current Look at Men’s and Women’s Characterizations of Others and Themselves. Frontiers in Psychology, 10.
In-text: (Hodel et al., 2017)
Your Bibliography: Hodel, L., Formanowicz, M., Sczesny, S., Valdrová, J. and von Stockhausen, L., 2017. Gender-Fair Language in Job Advertisements. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 48(3), pp.384-401.
In-text: (Latu et al., 2011)
Your Bibliography: Latu, I., Stewart, T., Myers, A., Lisco, C., Estes, S. and Donahue, D., 2011. What We “Say” and What We “Think” About Female Managers. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 35(2), pp.252-266.
In-text: (Luong, 2007)
Your Bibliography: Luong, A., 2007. Gender and the underexpression of friendliness in the service context. Journal of Management & Organization, 13(2), pp.102-113.
In-text: (Mikić, Kanjuo Mrčela and Kalin Golob, 2018)
Your Bibliography: Mikić, J., Kanjuo Mrčela, A. and Kalin Golob, M., 2018. Gendered and ‘Ageed’ Language and Power Inequalities: An Intersectional Approach. Gender a výzkum / Gender and Research, 19(2), pp.32-54.
In-text: (O'Brian, 2019)
Your Bibliography: O'Brian, S., 2019. Here’s How Your Word Choices Could Affect Hiring Gender-Diverse Talent. [online] Business.linkedin.com. Available at: <https://business.linkedin.com/talent-solutions/blog/diversity/2019/how-word-choice-affects-hiring-gender-diverse-talent> [Accessed 9 November 2019].
In-text: (Quayle et al., 2017)
Your Bibliography: Quayle, M., Lindegger, G., Brittain, K., Nabee, N. and Cole, C., 2017. Women’s Ideals for Masculinity Across Social Contexts: Patriarchal Agentic Masculinity is Valued in Work, Family, and Romance but Communal Masculinity in Friendship. Sex Roles, 78(1-2), pp.52-66.
In-text: (Rubini and Menegatti, 2014)
Your Bibliography: Rubini, M. and Menegatti, M., 2014. Hindering Women’s Careers in Academia. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 33(6), pp.632-650.
In-text: (Smith, Rosenstein, Nikolov and Chaney, 2018)
Your Bibliography: Smith, D., Rosenstein, J., Nikolov, M. and Chaney, D., 2018. The Power of Language: Gender, Status, and Agency in Performance Evaluations. Sex Roles, 80(3-4), pp.159-171.
In-text: (Snyder, 2019)
Your Bibliography: Snyder, K., 2019. The resume gap: Gender differences lead to tech's poor diversity. [online] Fortune. Available at: <https://fortune.com/2015/03/26/the-resume-gap-women-tell-stories-men-stick-to-facts-and-get-the-advantage/> [Accessed 9 November 2019].
In-text: (Turrentine et al., 2019)
Your Bibliography: Turrentine, F., Dreisbach, C., St Ivany, A., Hanks, J. and Schroen, A., 2019. Influence of Gender on Surgical Residency Applicants' Recommendation Letters. Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 228(4), pp.356-365.e3.
In-text: (van der Lee and Ellemers, 2015)
Your Bibliography: van der Lee, R. and Ellemers, N., 2015. Gender contributes to personal research funding success in The Netherlands. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(40), pp.12349-12353.
In-text: (Villablanca, Li, Beckett and Howell, 2017)
Your Bibliography: Villablanca, A., Li, Y., Beckett, L. and Howell, L., 2017. Evaluating a Medical School's Climate for Women's Success: Outcomes for Faculty Recruitment, Retention, and Promotion. Journal of Women's Health, 26(5), pp.530-539.
In-text: (Wessel, Hagiwara, Ryan and Kermond, 2014)
Your Bibliography: Wessel, J., Hagiwara, N., Ryan, A. and Kermond, C., 2014. Should Women Applicants “Man Up” for Traditionally Masculine Fields? Effectiveness of Two Verbal Identity Management Strategies. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 39(2), pp.243-255.
10,587 students joined last month!