Age and Attractiveness Preferences in Human Mate Selection: Evidence from Personal Ads in UK Newspapers - Psychology bibliographies - in Harvard style

In-text: (Adams, 1977)

Your Bibliography: Adams, G., 1977. Physical Attractiveness Research. Human Development, 20(4), pp.217-239.

In-text: (Bailey, Durante and Geary, 2011)

Your Bibliography: Bailey, D., Durante, K. and Geary, D., 2011. Men's perception of women's attractiveness is calibrated to relative mate value and dominance of the women's partner. Evolution and Human Behavior, 32(2), pp.138-146.

In-text: (Barber, 1995)

Your Bibliography: Barber, N., 1995. The evolutionary psychology of physical attractiveness: Sexual selection and human morphology. Ethology and Sociobiology, 16(5), pp.395-424.

In-text: (Buss and Barnes, 1986)

Your Bibliography: Buss, D. and Barnes, M., 1986. Preferences in human mate selection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(3), pp.559-570.

In-text: (Chiarelli and Campbell, 1974)

Your Bibliography: Chiarelli, A. and Campbell, B., 1974. Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man 1871-1971. Man, 9(1), p.143.

In-text: (Chu, Hardaker and Lycett, 2007)

Your Bibliography: Chu, S., Hardaker, R. and Lycett, J., 2007. Too good to be ‘true’? The handicap of high socio-economic status in attractive males. Personality and Individual Differences, 42(7), pp.1291-1300.

In-text: (COLWELL, 2007)

Your Bibliography: COLWELL, J., 2007. AN EMPIRlCAL TEST OF SEX DIFFERENCES IN THE EMPHASIS ON PHYSICAL ATTRACTIVENESS IN MATE SELECTION. PMS, 105(5), p.326.

In-text: (Feingold, 1990)

Your Bibliography: Feingold, A., 1990. Gender differences in effects of physical attractiveness on romantic attraction: A comparison across five research paradigms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(5), pp.981-993.

In-text: (Feingold, 1992)

Your Bibliography: Feingold, A., 1992. Gender differences in mate selection preferences: A test of the parental investment model. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), pp.125-139.

In-text: (Furnham, 2009)

Your Bibliography: Furnham, A., 2009. Sex differences in mate selection preferences. Personality and Individual Differences, 47(4), pp.262-267.

In-text: (Goode, 1996)

Your Bibliography: Goode, E., 1996. Gender and courtship entitlement: Responses to personal ads. Sex Roles, 34(3-4), pp.141-169.

In-text: (Greenlees and McGrew, 1994)

Your Bibliography: Greenlees, I. and McGrew, W., 1994. Sex and age differences in preferences and tactics of mate attraction: Analysis of published advertisements. Ethology and Sociobiology, 15(2), pp.59-72.

In-text: (Harrison and Saeed, 1977)

Your Bibliography: Harrison, A. and Saeed, L., 1977. Let's make a deal: An analysis of revelations and stipulations in lonely hearts advertisements. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35(4), pp.257-264.

In-text: (Lee et al., 2014)

Your Bibliography: Lee, A., Dubbs, S., Von Hippel, W., Brooks, R. and Zietsch, B., 2014. A multivariate approach to human mate preferences. Evolution and Human Behavior, 35(3), pp.193-203.

In-text: (Li et al., 2013)

Your Bibliography: Li, N., Yong, J., Tov, W., Sng, O., Fletcher, G., Valentine, K., Jiang, Y. and Balliet, D., 2013. Mate preferences do predict attraction and choices in the early stages of mate selection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105(5), pp.757-776.

In-text: (Montoya, 2008)

Your Bibliography: Montoya, R., 2008. I'm Hot, So I'd Say You're Not: The Influence of Objective Physical Attractiveness on Mate Selection. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(10), pp.1315-1331.

In-text: (Okami and Shakelford, 2001)

Your Bibliography: Okami, P. and Shakelford, T., 2001. Human Sex Differences in Sexual Psychology and Behaviour. Annual Review of Sex Research, 12, pp.186-241.

In-text: (Price and Vandenberg, 1980)

Your Bibliography: Price, R. and Vandenberg, S., 1980. Spouse similarity in American and Swedish couples. Behavior Genetics, 10(1), pp.59-71.

In-text: (Rhodes, Simmons and Peters, 2005)

Your Bibliography: Rhodes, G., Simmons, L. and Peters, M., 2005. Attractiveness and sexual behavior: Does attractiveness enhance mating success?. Evolution and Human Behavior, 26(2), pp.186-201.

In-text: (Schwarz and Hassebrauck, 2012)

Your Bibliography: Schwarz, S. and Hassebrauck, M., 2012. Sex and Age Differences in Mate-Selection Preferences. Hum Nat, 23(4), pp.447-466.

In-text: (Singh and Young, 1995)

Your Bibliography: Singh, D. and Young, R., 1995. Body weight, waist-to-hip ratio, breasts, and hips: Role in judgments of female attractiveness and desirability for relationships. Ethology and Sociobiology, 16(6), pp.483-507.

In-text: (Singh, 1995)

Your Bibliography: Singh, D., 1995. Female judgment of male attractiveness and desirability for relationships: Role of waist-to-hip ratio and financial status. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(6), pp.1089-1101.

In-text: (Strassberg and English, 2014)

Your Bibliography: Strassberg, D. and English, B., 2014. An Experimental Study of Men’s and Women’s Personal Ads. Arch Sex Behav,.

In-text: (Symons, 1980)

Your Bibliography: Symons, D., 1980. The evolution of human sexuality revisited. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3(02), p.203.

In-text: (Thiessen and Gregg, 1980)

Your Bibliography: Thiessen, D. and Gregg, B., 1980. Human assortative mating and genetic equilibrium: An evolutionary perspective. Ethology and Sociobiology, 1(2), pp.111-140.

In-text: (Thiessen, Young and Burroughs, 1993)

Your Bibliography: Thiessen, D., Young, R. and Burroughs, R., 1993. Lonely hearts advertisements reflect sexually dimorphic mating strategies. Ethology and Sociobiology, 14(3), pp.209-229.

In-text: (Todd, Penke, Fasolo and Lenton, 2007)

Your Bibliography: Todd, P., Penke, L., Fasolo, B. and Lenton, A., 2007. Different cognitive processes underlie human mate choices and mate preferences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(38), pp.15011-15016.

In-text: (Todd, Penke, Fasolo and Lenton, 2007)

Your Bibliography: Todd, P., Penke, L., Fasolo, B. and Lenton, A., 2007. Different cognitive processes underlie human mate choices and mate preferences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(38), pp.15011-15016.

In-text: (Townsend and Levy, 1990)

Your Bibliography: Townsend, J. and Levy, G., 1990. Effects of potential partners' physical attractiveness and socioeconomic status on sexuality and partner selection. Arch Sex Behav, 19(2), pp.149-164.

In-text: (Townsend, 1989)

Your Bibliography: Townsend, J., 1989. Mate selection criteria. Ethology and Sociobiology, 10(4), pp.241-253.

In-text: (Valentine and Li, 2012)

Your Bibliography: Valentine, K. and Li, N., 2012. Encyclopedia of Human Behaviour. 2nd ed.

In-text: (Wiederman, 1993)

Your Bibliography: Wiederman, M., 1993. Evolved gender differences in mate preferences: Evidence from personal advertisements. Ethology and Sociobiology, 14(5), pp.331-351.

In-text: (Wincenciak et al., 2014)

Your Bibliography: Wincenciak, J., Fincher, C., Fisher, C., Hahn, A., Jones, B. and DeBruine, L., 2014. Mate choice, mate preference, and biological markets: the relationship between partner choice and health preference is modulated by women's own attractiveness. Evolution and Human Behavior,.