New bibliography - Psychology bibliographies - in Harvard style

In-text: (Alterovitz and Mendelsohn, 2011)

Your Bibliography: Alterovitz, S. and Mendelsohn, G., 2011. Partner preferences across the life span: Online dating by older adults. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 1(S), pp.89-95.

In-text: (Antfolk et al., 2015)

Your Bibliography: Antfolk, J., Salo, B., Alanko, K., Bergen, E., Corander, J., Sandnabba, N. and Santtila, P., 2015. Women's and men's sexual preferences and activities with respect to the partner's age: evidence for female choice. Evolution and Human Behavior, 36(1), pp.73-79.

In-text: (Bailey, Gaulin, Agyei and Gladue, 1994)

Your Bibliography: Bailey, J., Gaulin, S., Agyei, Y. and Gladue, B., 1994. Effects of gender and sexual orientation on evolutionarily relevant aspects of human mating psychology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(6), pp.1081-1093.

In-text: (Burrows, 2012)

Your Bibliography: Burrows, K., 2012. Age Preferences in Dating Advertisements by Homosexuals and Heterosexuals: From Sociobiological to Sociological Explanations. Arch Sex Behav, 42(2), pp.203-211.

In-text: (Buss and Barnes, 1986)

Your Bibliography: Buss, D. and Barnes, M., 1986. Preferences in human mate selection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(3), pp.559-570.

In-text: (Buss and Schmitt, 1993)

Your Bibliography: Buss, D. and Schmitt, D., 1993. Sexual Strategies Theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review, 100(2), pp.204-232.

In-text: (Buss, 1989)

Your Bibliography: Buss, D., 1989. Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12(01), p.1.

In-text: (Buss, Shackelford, Kirkpatrick and Larsen, 2001)

Your Bibliography: Buss, D., Shackelford, T., Kirkpatrick, L. and Larsen, R., 2001. A Half Century of Mate Preferences: The Cultural Evolution of Values. Journal of Marriage and Family, 63(2), pp.491-503.

In-text: (Darwin, 1981)

Your Bibliography: Darwin, C., 1981. The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.

In-text: (Dunn, Brinton and Clark, 2010)

Your Bibliography: Dunn, M., Brinton, S. and Clark, L., 2010. Universal sex differences in online advertisers age preferences: comparing data from 14 cultures and 2 religious groups. Evolution and Human Behavior, 31(6), pp.383-393.

In-text: (Gobrogge et al., 2007)

Your Bibliography: Gobrogge, K., Perkins, P., Baker, J., Balcer, K., Breedlove, S. and Klump, K., 2007. Homosexual Mating Preferences from an Evolutionary Perspective: Sexual Selection Theory Revisited. Arch Sex Behav, 36(5), pp.717-723.

In-text: (Greenlees and McGrew, 1994)

Your Bibliography: Greenlees, I. and McGrew, W., 1994. Sex and age differences in preferences and tactics of mate attraction: Analysis of published advertisements. Ethology and Sociobiology, 15(2), pp.59-72.

In-text: (Kenrick, Keefe, Gabrielidis and Cornelius, 1996)

Your Bibliography: Kenrick, D., Keefe, R., Gabrielidis, C. and Cornelius, J., 1996. Adolescents' Age Preferences for Dating Partners: Support for an Evolutionary Model of Life-History Strategies. Child Development, 67(4), p.1499.

In-text: (Lawson et al., 2014)

Your Bibliography: Lawson, J., James, C., Jannson, A., Koyama, N. and Hill, R., 2014. A comparison of heterosexual and homosexual mating preferences in personal advertisements. Evolution and Human Behavior, 35(5), pp.408-414.

In-text: (Li and Kenrick, 2006)

Your Bibliography: Li, N. and Kenrick, D., 2006. Sex Similarities and Differences in Preferences for Short-Term Mates: What, Whether, and Why. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(3), pp.468-489.

In-text: (Marlowe, 2004)

Your Bibliography: Marlowe, F., 2004. Mate preferences among Hadza hunter-gatherers. Hum Nat, 15(4), pp.365-376.

In-text: (Pawlowski, 2002)

Your Bibliography: Pawlowski, B., 2002. The impact of traits offered in personal advertisements on response rates. Evolution and Human Behavior, 23(2), pp.139-149.

In-text: (Russock, 2011)

Your Bibliography: Russock, H., 2011. An evolutionary interpretation of the effect of gender and sexual orientation on human mate selection preferences, as indicated by an analysis of personal advertisements. Behaviour, 148(3), pp.307-323.

In-text: (Smith, Konik and Tuve, 2010)

Your Bibliography: Smith, C., Konik, J. and Tuve, M., 2010. In Search of Looks, Status, or Something Else? Partner Preferences Among Butch and Femme Lesbians and Heterosexual Men and Women. Sex Roles, 64(9-10), pp.658-668.

In-text: (Wiederman, 1993)

Your Bibliography: Wiederman, M., 1993. Evolved gender differences in mate preferences: Evidence from personal advertisements. Ethology and Sociobiology, 14(5), pp.331-351.

In-text: (Wilson, 1975)

Your Bibliography: Wilson, E., 1975. Sociobiology. Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

In-text: (Yong and Li, 2012)

Your Bibliography: Yong, J. and Li, N., 2012. Cash in hand, want better looking mate: Significant resource cues raise men’s mating standards. Personality and Individual Differences, 53(1), pp.55-58.