These are the sources and citations used to research psyc 1a essay. This bibliography was generated on Cite This For Me on

  • Newspaper

    Aschwanden, C. and Koerth, M.

    How Two Grad Students Uncovered An Apparent Fraud — And A Way To Change Opinions On Transgender Rights

    2016 - FiveThirtyEight

    In-text: (Aschwanden and Koerth, 2016)

    Your Bibliography: Aschwanden, C. and Koerth, M., 2016. How Two Grad Students Uncovered An Apparent Fraud — And A Way To Change Opinions On Transgender Rights. FiveThirtyEight, [online] Available at: <https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/how-two-grad-students-uncovered-michael-lacour-fraud-and-a-way-to-change-opinions-on-transgender-rights/> [Accessed 9 November 2021].

  • Website

    Belluz, J.

    How the biggest fraud in political science nearly got missed

    2015

    In-text: (Belluz, 2015)

    Your Bibliography: Belluz, J., 2015. How the biggest fraud in political science nearly got missed. [online] Vox. Available at: <https://www.vox.com/2015/6/3/8720975/science-fraud-replication> [Accessed 9 November 2021].

  • Newspaper

    Bhattacharjee, Y.

    The Mind of a Con Man

    2013 - The New York Times

    In-text: (Bhattacharjee, 2013)

    Your Bibliography: Bhattacharjee, Y., 2013. The Mind of a Con Man. The New York Times, [online] Available at: <https://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/28/magazine/diederik-stapels-audacious-academic-fraud.html> [Accessed 8 November 2021].

  • Journal

    Fanelli, D.

    How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data

    2009 - PLoS ONE

    Depending on factors specific to each case, these misbehaviours lie somewhere on a continuum between scientific fraud, bias, and simple carelessness...

    In-text: (Fanelli, 2009)

    Your Bibliography: Fanelli, D., 2009. How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data. PLoS ONE, [online] 4(5), p.e5738. Available at: <https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0005738#pone.0005738-Steneck1> [Accessed 3 November 2021].

  • Journal

    Gelman, A. and Carlin, J.

    Beyond Power Calculations

    2014 - Perspectives on Psychological Science

    In-text: (Gelman and Carlin, 2014)

    Your Bibliography: Gelman, A. and Carlin, J., 2014. Beyond Power Calculations. Perspectives on Psychological Science, [online] 9(6), pp.641-651. Available at: <http://www.stat.columbia.edu/~gelman/research/published/retropower_final.pdf> [Accessed 8 November 2021].

  • Journal

    Head, M. L., Holman, L., Lanfear, R., Kahn, A. T. and Jennions, M. D.

    The Extent and Consequences of P-Hacking in Science

    2015 - PLOS Biology

    In-text: (Head et al., 2015)

    Your Bibliography: Head, M., Holman, L., Lanfear, R., Kahn, A. and Jennions, M., 2015. The Extent and Consequences of P-Hacking in Science. PLOS Biology, [online] 13(3), p.e1002106. Available at: <https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.1002106> [Accessed 5 November 2021].

  • Journal

    Kerr, N. L.

    HARKing: Hypothesizing After the Results are Known

    1998 - Personality and Social Psychology Review

    In-text: (Kerr, 1998)

    Your Bibliography: Kerr, N., 1998. HARKing: Hypothesizing After the Results are Known. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2(3), pp.196-217.

  • Book

    Klein, S. B.

    What can recent replication failures tell us about the theoretical commitments of psychology?

    2014

    over 60 articles were retracted from journals

    In-text: (Klein, 2014)

    Your Bibliography: Klein, S., 2014. What can recent replication failures tell us about the theoretical commitments of psychology?. p.326.

  • Website

    Palus, S.

    Diederik Stapel now has 58 retractions

    2015

    In-text: (Palus, 2015)

    Your Bibliography: Palus, S., 2015. Diederik Stapel now has 58 retractions. [online] Retraction Watch. Available at: <https://retractionwatch.com/2015/12/08/diederik-stapel-now-has-58-retractions/> [Accessed 5 November 2021].

  • Website

    Resnick, B.

    The Stanford Prison Experiment was massively influential. We just learned it was a fraud.

    2018

    In-text: (Resnick, 2018)

    Your Bibliography: Resnick, B., 2018. The Stanford Prison Experiment was massively influential. We just learned it was a fraud.. [online] Vox. Available at: <https://www.vox.com/2018/6/13/17449118/stanford-prison-experiment-fraud-psychology-replication> [Accessed 8 November 2021].

  • Journal

    Smith, R.

    What is research misconduct?

    2000 - The COPE Report 2000: the Committee on Publication Ethics.

    In-text: (Smith, 2000)

    Your Bibliography: Smith, R., 2000. What is research misconduct?. The COPE Report 2000: the Committee on Publication Ethics., [online] pp.7-12. Available at: <https://publicationethics.org/files/u7141/COPE2000pdfcomplete.pdf> [Accessed 7 November 2021].

  • Newspaper

    Verfaellie, M. and McGwin, J.

    The case of Diederik Stapel

    2011 - American Psychological Association

    In-text: (Verfaellie and McGwin, 2011)

    Your Bibliography: Verfaellie, M. and McGwin, J., 2011. The case of Diederik Stapel. American Psychological Association, [online] Available at: <https://www.apa.org/science/about/psa/2011/12/diederik-stapel> [Accessed 8 November 2021].

Click here to start building your own bibliography
Keep on Citing!
Cite This For Me:
The Easiest Tool to Create your Bibliographies Online
Join Us!

Save Time and Improve Your Marks with Cite This For Me

10,587 students joined last month!

  • ✔ Save your bibliographies for longer
  • ✔ Quick and accurate citation program
  • ✔ Save time when referencing
  • ✔ Make your student life easy and fun
  • ✔ Pay only once with our Forever plan
  • ✔ Use plagiarism checker
  • ✔ Create and edit multiple bibliographies
Join